
Share
14th May 2016
06:19pm BST

The BBC pundit has developed a reputation for bias against certain clubs. While that might not necessarily be the case, it certainly seems as though he overrates some teams and underrates others.
The evidence for this is a table shared by Digital Spy's Matt Hill, which shows just how wrong Lawro was by drawing up a league table based on his predictions over the course of the campaign.
The biggest disparities between actual and anticipated predictions come with Leicester City and West Ham United, who would be 12th and 17th respectively (instead of first and sixth) if Lawrenson had been spot-on every week.
Of course, for some clubs to be lower than their real position, others must be higher, and that honour goes to West Bromwich Albion (seventh instead of 15th), Newcastle United (11th instead of 18th) and Chelsea (third instead of ninth).
https://twitter.com/gethill/status/731400437459501056
Some fans might be angry with the pundit.
https://twitter.com/essojohn/status/726156140678107138
But others are just basking in his wrongness. After all, there's only one table that matters.
https://twitter.com/markblk9779/status/727241930992660481
https://twitter.com/glees5150/status/727241743704412160
At least he was right about Aston Villa.

Explore more on these topics: