
Share
26th April 2018
07:56am BST

The practice of watching and sharing illegal streams online is a common one, which many consider to leave them unlikely to be hit with prosecution. This makes Rasheed's case both a potential landmark and a warning to many.
On the company's website, Sky has plainly stated its commitment to protecting its multi-billion pound investment in sports broadcasting, something it appears to be backing up in this case.
The supply of illegal streams is a criminal offence and these suppliers don’t provide security, guarantees, or filters – users don’t know what’s on these boxes, they won’t get their money back when they fail, can expose themselves to malware and other security risks, and they can't protect their children from adult or inappropriate content.Will this ruling discourage others from spreading illegal live streams online? The continued proliferation of live streaming sites makes it appear unlikely. At the very least though, it will make them think twice before they do so. Premier League football is good, but not exactly worth a £45,000 fine.
Explore more on these topics: