
Share
6th December 2019
12:48pm GMT

But unfortunately, the most pressing change of all seems to have been only half-heeded by the proposals. The non-contact rule. The forbidding of shoulder tackles.
That was an out-dated rule that has been surpassed by the game's increasing physicality. Now was the time to bring it in line with the rule implemented in hurling.
Here is the rule regarding shoulders in hurling.
Provided that he has at least one foot on the ground, a player may make a shoulder to shoulder charge on an opponent- (a) who is in possession of the ball, or (b) who is playing the ball, or (c) when both players are moving in the same direction.This is the updated camogie rule.
"A player may now use minimal contact on an opponent’s body from side-on, once they are making a reasonable effort to gain possession of the ball."On The GAA Hour, both Colm Parkinson and Conan Doherty feel the word 'minimal' creates a grey area that will cause problems. "The contact one doesn't go far enough for me," says Colm Parkinson.
"Now what's that all about. It's either contact or it's not. What is minimal contact? So can you bury someone with a shoulder or can't you? Like I don't get it, you're either going to do it or you're not. They're not shrinking violets, they're well able to be physical. Why put a wishy-washy contact one in there where they're not really sure what they're allowed to do?""This is the thing that female athletes hate most," added Conan Doherty. 'Because they're not able for it,' You know that's what it reads like on the face of it, it's a bit sexist like. Yeah, they can do a bit of contact but not what the men do, and it's terrible..." "They grow up playing hurling and suddenly they're into a different sport, camogie players are crying out for hurling rules. They're not allowed to have contact, and now they're allowed minimal contact..." You can listen to the most recent episode of The GAA Hour here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l9loF2sodA
Explore more on these topics: