
Share
7th May 2015
11:18am BST

'Removed or secured the removal of the front shoes from Foxrock once he was alerted to the stewards’ enquiry into the running and riding of the horse. (ii) He concealed from the Turf Club and misled the Turf Club’s officers and stewards as to the true consequences in which the shoes were removed, suggesting variously and inaccurately that they came off in the race or on the walk to the veterinary unit.'Jockey Heskin however is likely to face some further penalty as the report finds that he was guilty of not pushing the horse as much as he could have during the race
'In the case of Mr Heskin, the Committee agreed with the evidence of Mr Matthews and Mr Noel O’Brien that with a more forceful ride in the closing stages it was probable that Foxrock could have achieved second place in the race. In the absence of any valid excuse or reason, the Committee found that Mr Heskin was in breach of Rule 212 by failing to take all reasonable and permissible measures in the latter part of the race to achieve the best possible placing, but was not guilty of any other breach of rule'Walsh called on Aiden O'brein and Willie Mullins as witnesses during the hearing last month The full 10 page report is available here
Explore more on these topics: