
Share
3rd April 2018
09:18am BST

"Man... my team and I haven't spoken with the UFC yet about what's next, but I saw it in an interview. That shocked me. That hurt me even more for something I couldn't control with this injury."Ferguson believes this is inconsistency on the UFC's part. He pointed to the case of Robert Whittaker. After Whittaker won the interim strap in June 2017, the UFC went ahead with Georges St-Pierre vs Michael Bisping for the undisputed title in December. Whittaker was allowed to keep his belt despite another title fight going ahead in his division.
"The UFC hasn't said anything to me about my title going away and I don't think it (should) go away. They shouldn't strip a champion due to a freak injury that happened during a UFC obligated media event. Seriously, there is a precedent of fighting for a 'real' title and keeping an 'interim' title intact. They just did that with Robert Whittaker last year."https://twitter.com/SportsJOEdotie/status/980905459774353408
"This was going to be by far the biggest payday ever for him. He was making some good money because of the belt. So if you strip him, his next fight he doesn't have that belt anymore to get money. If you don't have a belt, hell yeah (you get significantly less money)." "If you're going to negotiate for a fight and you have a belt, you have way more power than if you don't have a belt. So by stripping him of the belt, his next fight when he heals up and comes back, it's going to cost him. It's not fair because Robert Whittaker didn't get stripped of his interim belt. Max Holloway and Khabib should just fight a main event fight. It doesn't have to be for a belt, because that's going to fuck Tony."There's a reason why fighters suddenly become more risk-averse once they reach the summit. That coveted golden strap is lucrative - be it interim or undisputed.
Explore more on these topics: