
Share
3rd August 2021
05:49pm BST

"The only thing I'm disappointed about in World Rugby's statement is that they've kind of inadvertently dragged us into it. "We've tried to, we think, maintain as much integrity as we can, in terms of we haven't been commenting on refereeing. We never questioned the TMO. The only question we asked is why hadn't World Rugby put a contingency plan in place if people couldn't travel or got sick. "That's the only question that we had asked. So I'm really, really disappointed with a part of the statement where they've sort of said both sides have been making comments and being critical of the officials. "I'd like someone to show me where we have done that. We've looked through everything and we can't see any instances where we've been critical of the officials. In fact, I think we've praised the officials."
Gatland says the Lions only discovered on the Wednesday of the First Test that Pickerill would not be in South Africa to take up the T.M.O role. His concern was that World Rugby had been aware of the travel issue for a week before informing the Lions.
Asked if he had requested a neutral T.M.O for the Test Series, Gatland said he had. It was then that he brought up former Ireland head coach Joe Schmidt, who is now with World Rugby as Director of Rugby and High Performance.
"I spoke to Joe Schmidt who is involved to give me some clarity on the decision and just asking why plans hadn't been put in place regarding this. "It's not just the TMO, what would have happened if the referees couldn't make it out here? "We've had contingency plans for a couple of things in case things happened with Covid so that we'd be covered. So, there was no question about people being involved. What we questioned was the process."The Lions, it would appear, were within their rights to question why the Pickerill situation had not been resolved, and was then kept from them. They were not happy with how they had been left with little recourse but to accept Jonker, but it was unfortunate how this then spiralled into the wide-spread reporting that placed the South African under more pressure.
Explore more on these topics: