
Share
9th December 2015
11:11am GMT

The expansion from 16 teams to 24 means that the simple symmetry of previous tournaments has been lost. Where there used to be four group winners meeting four runners-up in the quarter-finals, there is now a messy second round of 16 teams.
This means all six group winners and runners-up will be joined by the four best third-placed teams. A quick glance at this shows that the numbers don't really add up, as two group winners will have to face two runners-up while the rest of the table-toppers take on a third-placed team.
So if you are drawn in Group F, then there is no real incentive to top your group as both first and second place will meet a runner-up from another group.
But Group E is the worst pool to be drawn into as the winner faces Group D's runner-up while second place in Group E has to take on the winner of Group F.
It's all a little confusing, and only gets more complicated (and unfair) when you look at the quarter-final draw. If the winners of either Group A or D overcome their third-placed opposition in the second round, then they are guaranteed to face the runner-up of another group in the quarter-finals.
With the way the qualification for the tournament has gone, there are no guarantees that a group winner will beat a third-placed team (the Republic of Ireland picked up four points from two games against Germany, for instance), but things certainly do look easier for whichever teams win Groups A and D and particularly tough for the members of Groups E and F.Explore more on these topics: